Abstract
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26333/sts.xxxvi1.11
E. E. Constance Jones (1848–1922) was one of the first women to study philosophy at the University of Cambridge. On her view, “Dorothea” (from George Eliot’s novel Middlemarch) applies to a fictional character, which has existence in fiction, and “fairy” applies to fairies, which have existence in imagination. She proposes a novel account of negative existentials, on which “fairies are non-existent” is both meaningful and true, given that there are at least two kinds of existence: one that fairies have (so that we can talk about them) and another that they lack (so that we can truly say that they “are non-existent”). Contrary to Russell’s objection in The Principles of Mathematics, accounting for negative existentials does not require distinguishing existence and being, nor does it require rejecting the existential theory of judgment (according to which every sentence is about something that exists).
References
Bricker, P. (2020). Modal Matters: Essays in Metaphysics. Oxford: OUP.
Caplan, B. (2021). Fregean Theories of Names from Fiction. In S. Biggs, H. Geirsson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Reference (pp. 384–396). New York: Routledge.
Caplan, B. (2022). E. E. Constance Jones on Unique Existence. Asian Journal of Philosophy, 1(1), 1–24. doi:10.1007/s44204-022-00022-6
Frege, G. (1892/1948). Sense and Reference. Philosophical Review, 57(3), 209–230.
Frischhut, A. M., Skiles, A. (2013). Time, Modality, and the Unbearable Lightness of Being. Thought, 2(1), 264–273.
Hillebrand, F. (1891). Die neuen Theorien der kategorischen Schlüsse: Eine logische Untersuchung. Vienna: Hölder.
James, W. (1889). The Psychology of Belief. Mind, 14(55), 321–352.
Janssen-Lauret, F. (in press). Grandmothers of Analytic Philosophy: The Formal and Philosophical Logic of Christine Ladd-Franklin and Constance Jones. Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science.
Jones, E. E. C. (1890). Elements of Logic as a Science of Propositions. Edinburgh: Clark.
Jones, E. E. C. (1892). Review of Franz Hillebrand, Die neuen Theorien der kategorischen Schlüsse. Mind, 1(2), 276–281.
Jones, E. E. C. (1893). On the Nature of Logical Judgment. Mind, 2(8), 441–456.
Jones, E. E. C. (1905). A Primer of Logic. London: Murray.
Jones, E. E. C. (1908). Import of Propositions and Inference. Mind, 17(68), 527–534.
Jones, E. E. C. (1910–1911). A New Law of Thought. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 11, 166–186.
Jones, E. E. C. (1911). A New Law of Thought and Its Logical Bearings (Girton College Studies 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, E. E. C. (1922). As I Remember: An Autobiographical Ramble. London: Black.
Keynes, J. N. (1887). Studies and Exercises in Formal Logic: Including a Generalization of Logical Processes in the Application to Complex Inferences (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
Kripke, S. A. (2013). Reference and Existence: The John Locke Lectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. K. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
McDaniel, K. (2017). The Fragmentation of Being. Oxford: OUP.
Meinong, A. (1904/1960). The Theory of Objects. In R. M. Chisholm (Ed.), Realism and the Background of Phenomenology (pp. 76–117). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Ostertag, G. (2020). Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/emily-elizabeth-constance-jones/
Ostertag, G. (in press). E. E. Constance Jones on Identity and Diversity. In J. Peijnenburg, S. Verhaegh (Eds.), Women in the History of Analytic Philosophy: Selected Papers of the Tilburg-Groningen Conference, 2019. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ostertag, G., Favia, A. (2021). E. E. Constance Jones on the Dualism of Practical Reason. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 29(2), 327–342.
Parsons, T. (1980). Nonexistent Objects. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Russell, B. (1903). The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Russell, B. (1905). On Denoting. Mind, 14(56), 479–493.
Russell, B. (1919). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy (Muirhead Library of Philosophy). London: Allen and Unwin.
Salmon, N. (1998). Nonexistence. Noûs, 32(3), 277–319.
Turner, J. (2013). PAPEal Infallibility? Thought, 2(3), 274–280.
Twardowski, K. (1894/1977). On the Content and Object of Presentations: A Psychological Investigation (Melbourne International Philosophy Series 4). The Hague: Nijhoff.
van Inwagen, P. (1977). Creatures of Fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly, 14(4), 299–308.
Venn, J. (1881). Symbolic Logic. London: Macmillan.
Waithe, M. E., Cicero, S. (1995). E. E. Constance Jones (1848–1922). In M. E. Waithe (Ed.), A History of Women Philosophers. Vol. 4: Contemporary Women Philosophers, 1900–Today (pp. 25–49). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Warnock, M. (2004). Jones, (Emily Elizabeth) Constance (1848–1922). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/48443