Abstract
DOI: http://doi.org/10.26333/sts.xxviii.13
The aim of the paper is to propose a unified formal account of dialogical cognitive processes so that it allows the analysis of similarities and differences between those processes. Formal dialogue systems constitute two basic categories or paradigms of modelling communication depending on what cognitive process is described by a given system. The first paradigm consists of designing a set of dialogue rules in a similar manner to Lorenzen’s dialogue logic (1978), and according to which players jointly aim to show (prove) the validity of a formula. In such cases we will say that the system describes formal dialogues and the formal cognitive process of proving the validity of a formula. The second paradigm focuses on building a system similar to Hamblin’s formal dialectics (1970), which “simulates” the real-life communication practice. In the type of dialogues described by those systems, players perform “good” argumentation, i.e. argumentation which fulfils certain requirements of rationality such as e.g. the requirement of not committing a fallacy of circular reasoning (begging the question). In such a case we will be speaking of a natural dialogue and a natural cognitive process of argumentation.
References
Alama Jesse, Sara L. Uckelman. 2011. Lorenzen dialogue games as logical semantics W Internatinal colloquium. Inside arguments: Logic vs Argumentation theory, 1-14. Faculty of Letters of the University of Coimbra.
Bench-Capon Trevor J. 1998. "Specification and implementation of Toulmin dialogue game". Proceedings of JURIX 98 : 5–20.
Blackburn Patrick. 2001. "Modal logic as dialogical logic". Synthese 127 : 57–93.
Blass Andreas. 1992. "A game semantics for linear logic”. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 56 : 183–220.
Budzyńska Katarzyna. 2013. "Retoryczne strategie poznawcze". Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria 22 (2) : 253-274.
Budzyńska Katarzyna, Chris Reed. 2016. "Znaki dyskursywne jako źródło i manifestacja inferencyjnych procesów poznawczych". Studia Semiotyczne XXVIII–XXIX : 173–193.
Eemeren Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hamblin Charles Leonard. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.
Hansen Hans V., Robert C. Pinto (red.). 1995. Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Hodges Wilfred. 2009. "Logic and Games". W The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E. N. Zalta (red.). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-games/
Hołówka Teresa. 1998. Błędy, spory, argumenty. Szkice z logiki stosowanej. Warszawa: Wydział Filozofii i Socjologii UW.
Koszowy Marcin. 2013. "A Methodological Approach to Argument Evaluation: Rules of Defining as Applied in Assessing Arguments". Filozofia Nauki 1 (81) : 23–36.
Koszowy Marcin, Katarzyna Budzyńska, Olena Yaskorska. 2013. "Kryteria poprawności technik komunikacyjno-poznawczych". Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa 2 (196) : 145–172.
Lorenz Konrad. 1987. Logika dialogowa. W Logika formalna: zarys encyklopedyczny z zastosowaniem do informatyki i lingwistyki, W. Marciszewski (red.), 83–91. Warszawa: PWN.
Lorenz Konrad, Paul Lorenzen. 1978. Dialogische Logik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Mackenzie Jim D. 1979. "Question begging in non-cumulative systems". Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 : 117–133.
Prakken Henry. 2006. "Formal systems for persuasion dialogue". Knowledge Engineering Review 21 : 163–188.
Rahman Shahid, Laurent Keiff. 2004. On how to be a dialogician. W Logic, Thought and Action, D. Vanderveken (red.), 359–408. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rahman Shahid, Matthias Fishmann, Helge Rueckert. 1997. "On Dialogues and Ontology. The Dialogical Approach to Free Logic". Logique et Analyse 160 : 357–374.
Reed Chris, Douglas Walton. 2007. "Argumentation schemes in dialogue". W Diessensus and the Search of Common Ground (Proceedings of OSSA 2007), H. V. Hansen et al. (red.). Windsor, Ontario: University of Windsor.
Tokarz Marek. 2006. Argumentacja. Perswazja. Manipulacja. Wykłady z teorii komunikacji. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Walton Douglas. 1995. A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy. Tuscaloosa–London: The University of Alabama Press.
Walton Douglas. 1999. "The Fallacy of Many Questions: On the Notions of Complexity, Loadedness and Unfair Entrapment in Interrogative Theory.” Argumentation 13 : 379–383.
Walton Douglas N., Lynn M. Batten. 1984. "Games, graphs and circular arguments". Logique et Analyse 106 : 133-64.
Walton Douglas N., Erik C. W. Krabbe. 1995. "Commitment in Dialogue". Series in Logic and Language. State University of New York Press.
Woods John, Douglas N. Walton. 1978. "Arresting circles in formal dialogues". Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 : 73–90.
Woods John, Douglas N. Walton. 1989. Fallacies. Selected Papers 1972–1982. Dordrecht-Providence-Berlin: Foris Publications-Mouton de Gruyter.
Yaskorska Olena, Katarzyna Budzyńska. 2014. "Akty komunikacyjne w dialogach formalnych, (Communication Acts in Formal Dialogues)”. Filozofia Nauki 3 (87) : 43–66.