Abstrakt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26333/sts.xxxvi1.05
In this article, I argue for two theses. The first is that, among different existing accounts of proper name semantics, indexicalism—a stance that treats proper names as indexical expressions—is best suited to explaining various phenomena exhibited by the use of proper names in fictional discourse. I will discuss these phenomena and compare the solutions offered by traditional descriptivist and causal-historical theories of proper name reference with those proposed by indexicalists. Subsequently, I will offer a novel account of indexicalism about proper names, which uses the apparatus of so-called hybrid expressions (Ciecierski, 2020; Künne, 1992; Predelli, 2006) as an alternative to traditional Kaplanian semantics for demonstratives. I offer an argument explaining why, among the variety of indexical views, one should favour such a hybrid theory over other available ones (e.g., Pelczar, Rainsbury, 1998; Rami, 2014) based on the analysis of “distributed utterances” (McCullagh, 2020) and statements that employ more than one fictional context.
Bibliografia
Adams, F., Fuller, G., Stecker, R. (1993). Thoughts Without Objects. Mind & Language, 8(1), 90–104.
Bach, K. (2002). Giorgione Was So-Called Because of His Name. Philosophical Perspectives, 16, 73–103.
Berto, F., Jago, M. (2019). Impossible Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Braun, D. (1993). Empty Names. Noûs, 27(4), 449–469.
Braun, D. (1996). Demonstratives and Their Linguistic Meanings. Noûs, 30(2), 145–173.
Ciecierski, T. (2019). Hybrid Expressions. In G. Bella, P. Bouquet (Eds.), Modeling and Using Context. International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context (pp. 51–61). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34974-5_5
Burge, T. (1973). Reference and Proper Names. The Journal of Philosophy, 70(14), 425–439.
Ciecierski, T. (2019). Hybrid Expressions. In G. Bella, P. Bouquet (Eds.), Modeling and Using Context (11th International and Interdisciplinary Conference, CONTEXT 2019, Trento, Italy, November 20–22, 2019, Proceedings, pp. 51–61). Cham: Springer.
Ciecierski, T. (2020). Utterances, Sub‐utterances and Token‐Reflexivity. Theoria, 86(4), 439–462.
Currie, G. (1986). Fictional truth. Philosophical Studies, 50(2), 195–212.
Czeżowski, T. (1958). Token-Reflexive Words Versus Proper Names. In J. Pelc (Ed.), Semiotics in Poland 1894–1969 (pp. 65–72). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Evans G. (1982), The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grudzińska, J. (2007). Semantyka nazw jednostkowych [Semantics of Singular Terms]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper.
Ingarden, R. (1931). Das Literarische Kunstwerk [The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Irmak, N. (2019). An Ontology of Words. Erkenntnis, 84(5), 1139–1158.
Jeshion, R. (2017). ‘The’ Problem for The-Predicativism. Philosophical Review, 126(2), 219–240.
Kaplan, D. (1989a). Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry, H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481–564). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, D. (1989b). Afterthoughts. In J. Almog, J. Perry, H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 565–614). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, D. (1990). Words. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society: Supplementary Volumes, 64(1), 93–119.
Klauk, T. (2014). Zalta on Encoding Fictional Properties. Journal of Literary Theory, 8(2), 234–256.
Korta, K., Perry, J. (2011). Critical Pragmatics. An Inquiry into Reference and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kripke, S. (1979). A Puzzle About Belief. In A. Margalit (Ed.), Meaning and Use (pp. 239–283). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Künne, W. (1992). Hybrid Proper Names. Mind, 101(404), 721–731.
Künne, W. (2010). Sense, Reference and Hybridity: Reflections on Kripke’s Recent Reading of Frege. Dialectica, 64(4), 529–551.
Lewis, D. (1970). Anselm and Actuality. Noûs, 4(2), 175–188.
Lewis, D. (1978). Truth in Fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly, 15(1), 37–46.
Matushansky, O. (2008). On the Linguistic Complexity of Proper Names. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31(5), 573–627.
McCullagh, M. (2020). Distributed Utterances. In T. Ciecierski, P. Grabarczyk (Eds.), The Architecture of Context and Context-Sensitivity (pp. 113–124). Cham: Springer.
Pelczar, M. W., Rainsbury, J. M. (1998). The Indexical Character of Names. Synthese, 114(2), 293–317.
Penco, C. (2021). Indexicals and Essential Demonstrations. Semiotica, 2021(240), 261–284.
Predelli, S. (1997). Talk About Fiction. Erkenntnis, 46(1), 69–77.
Predelli, S. (1998). I Am Not Here Now. Analysis, 58(2), 107–115.
Predelli, S. (2006). Hybrid Indexicals and Ellipsis. Erkenntnis, 65(3), 385–403.
Predelli, S. (2008). Modal Monsters and Talk About Fiction. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 37(3), 277–297.
Priest, G. (2005). Towards Non-Being: the Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rami, D. (2014). The Use-Conditional Indexical Conception of Proper Names. Philosophical Studies, 168(1), 119–150.
Recanati, F. (1993). Direct reference: From language to thought. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Ridley, P. (2016). A Pragmatic View of Proper Name Reference. (Doctoral dissertation, King’s College of London, London, United Kingdom). Retrieved from: https://philarchive.org/archive/RIDAPV
Russell, B. (1905). On Denoting. Mind, 14(56), 479–493.
Semeijn, M., Zalta, E. N. (2021). Revisiting the ‘Wrong Kind of Object’ Problem. Organon F, 28(1), 168–197.
Tarnowski, M. (2022). Proper Names as Demonstratives. Argumenta. doi:10.14275/2465-2334/202200.tar
Tiedke, H. (2011). Proper Names and Their Fictional Uses. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89(4), 707–726.
Textor, M. (2015). Frege’s Theory of Hybrid Proper Names Extended. Mind, 124(495), 823–847.
Thomasson, A. L. (1999). Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge: CUP.
Voltolini, A. (1995). Indexinames. In J. Hill, P. Koťátko (Eds.), Karlovy Vary Studies in Reference and Meaning (pp. 258–285). Prague: Filosofia Publications.
Voltolini, A. (2014). Fiction and Indexinames. Journal of Literary Theory, 8(2), 293–322.
Zalta, E. N. (2003). Referring to Fictional Characters. Dialectica, 57(2), 243–254.